I’ve written about
the myths and ‘real truths’ of Thanksgiving before (Nov. 27, 2009). But today,
as I was rereading some of the more contemporary truths about the subsequent butchery
of Native Americans that took place, I couldn’t help thinking about how this
story of our American origins leads to uncomfortable parallels with the more
modern butchery we like to deplore in the Middle East. We love to call the
terrorists of ISIS, for example, ‘barbarians’ and ‘savages.’ And in truth,
reading a piece today by David Remnick in the New Yorker (“Telling the Truth About ISIS and Raqqa”, reprinted on
Reader Supported News), in which he interviews some exiled residents of the
ISIS stronghold of Raqqa about the horrors that descended upon that previously
civilized city when ISIS took over, those same adjectives flashed into my mind:
bastards, savages, barbarians. But the truth is that they are not savages or
barbarians. If there is any name that fits the fanatics of ISIS, it would have
to be ‘fundamentalists.’ For they are, as countless histories have now
detailed, adherents to the type of Islamic fundamentalism native to Saudi
Arabia (one of their supporters), the branch called Wahhabism. When the ISIS
leaders—both remnants of Al Quaeda in Iraq and many of the former Sunni leaders
of Iraq including army officers quite skilled in combat—took over Raqqa, they
immediately named it the center of the caliphate that Wahhabism calls for: a
place where the most radically fundamentalist ideals of Islam can be
implemented and spread throughout the world, including the public execution of
infidels.
As the
former residents of Raqqa describe it, the savagery instituted by the fanatics
of ISIS horrified everyone:
The first crucifixion came early that spring—a
horrific event to recall even now. Everyone at the table remembered the shock
of it. Then came more: two people, shot in the head by ISIS executioners,
crucified, and left for days for all to witness in the city’s main traffic
roundabout.
According to the testimony, this was a kind of
violence never seen before: crucifixions, cutting off heads, brutally-enforced edicts
against forbidden pleasures. The repression and violence against women was
especially vicious:
There were edicts against drinking and smoking.
Enforced by an all-female morality police called the Khansaa Brigade, women
were made to wear the veil and, eventually, black shoes only. They are beaten
if their niqab is somehow too revealing, a veil too flimsy, or if they are caught
walking on the street alone.
Children, too, are targeted. Regular schools
are closed in favor of ISIS religious institutions teaching them “the most
fanatical form of the faith.” Then, many are lured or kidnapped and sent to
military camps to learn how to fight and kill, “how to make and carry bombs. At
their graduation, they have orders to execute someone––sometimes a beheading,
sometimes they just cut off the head of a sheep.” As to the journalists of the
publicity groups being interviewed by Remnick, the R.B.S.S. or Raqqa is Being
Slaughtered Silently, they are hounded and tracked via the internet where they
post much of their work. One has already been captured, caught at a checkpoint
and executed three weeks later in Raqqa’s public square.
Of
course, it goes without saying that ISIS has already proven that when attacking
‘infidels,’ which is to say, the rest of the world, they are as ruthless and
callous about killing innocents as any group in history. The attacks on Paris,
the bombing of the Russian airliner with 224 people aboard, the suicide attacks
in Lebanon and Iraq and Mali, and the public beheadings posted on the internet,
are all grim proof of that. But what strikes me today is that the comparison to
other fundamentalist groups comes right back to America, to our founding myths
and those who are celebrated in them.
The
Pilgrims, for example, are the historical heroes of the alleged First
Thanksgiving. It has become part of the legend that the Pilgrims—those few who
survived the first winter in their new-found paradise near Plymouth—held a
thanksgiving feast to celebrate the corn harvest that had kept them alive, and
invited the local Indians to share it with them. But it is important to know
that these Pilgrims were themselves an extreme branch of the Puritan sect that
had waged revolutionary war against the Crown in their native England (the
Puritans triumphed for a short time in 1653), and had fled to the New World for
safety and to erect a new government based on their rigidly fundamentalist
beliefs (including a coming Armageddon). Chuck Larsen, basing much of his
summary on the work of Francis Jennings in The
Invasion of America, has written about their fanaticism as follows:
They strove to
"purify" first themselves and then everyone else of everything they
did not accept in their own interpretation of scripture. Later New England
Puritans used any means, including deceptions, treachery, torture, war, and
genocide to achieve that end.(4) They saw themselves as fighting a
holy war against Satan, and everyone who disagreed with them was the enemy.
This rigid fundamentalism was transmitted to America by the Plymouth colonists,
and it sheds a very different light on the "Pilgrim" image we have of
them. This is best illustrated in the written text of the Thanksgiving sermon
delivered at Plymouth in 1623 by "Mather the Elder." In it, Mather
the Elder gave special thanks to God for the devastating plague of smallpox
which wiped out the majority of the Wampanoag Indians who had been their
benefactors. He praised God for destroying “chiefly young men and children, the
very seeds of increase, thus clearing the forests to make way for a better
growth.” (Chuck Larsen, “Introduction for Teachers,” http://www.manataka.org/page269.html).
Furthermore, the
Indian hero, Squanto, supposedly one of those who helped arrange the feast, managed
to be there because he was one of the few Indians who had survived both slavery
in England and the above-mentioned smallpox epidemic that decimated the natives
after an initial contact with English explorers in 1614. And subsequent
“Thanksgivings” celebrated by the now-dominant Puritans of the Massachusetts
Bay Colony rather stain the myth of generous settlers sharing a meal with happy
natives. In 1637, for example, near Groton, CT, “nearly 700 men, women and
children of the Pequot Tribe had gathered for their annual Green Corn
Festival”—the actual precursor of Thanksgiving. What happened next was a
horror:
In the
predawn hours the sleeping Indians were surrounded by English and Dutch
mercenaries who ordered them to come outside. Those who came out were
shot or clubbed to death while the terrified women and children who huddled
inside the longhouse were burned alive. The next day the governor of the
Massachusetts Bay Colony declared "A Day Of Thanksgiving" because 700
unarmed men, women and children had been murdered. (Susan Bates, “The Real
Story of Thanksgiving,” http://www.manataka.org/page269.html.
This massacre-cum-Thanksgiving was followed by others, like a similar
massacre of Pequots near Stamford CT where severed heads were kicked around
like soccer balls, and the similarly savage King Philip’s War, which
essentially ended the presence of Native Americans in New England. Any who were
left either fled to Canada, or were rounded up and sold into slavery in the
Carolinas (thus providing the inspiration for the Bostonians to troll in Africa
for other slaves to fatten their purses and curse the new nation for
generations to come).
In sum, for the life of
me, I can’t figure out how to distinguish our ‘noble’ ancestral founders from
the fanatic fundamentalists now ravaging Syria, Iraq and the entire Middle East—nor,
for that matter, the crazy fundamentalists now running for president on the
Republican ticket. All are certain of their possession of the truth. All are convinced
that the only way to rid the world of ‘infidels’ or ‘unbelievers’ or ‘sinners’
against their ‘god-given’ law is to either convert them or kill them. And the
sad thing is that everywhere one finds these purists, these soldiers in the war
to institute their precious god’s kingdom on earth, killing seems to be the preferred
option.
Lawrence DiStasi
No comments:
Post a Comment