Sunday, November 28, 2021

Vultures

 

The other morning on my daily walk, I encountered a dead skunk on Elm Road in Bolinas. At first, I couldn’t identify it, but then the black fur and large white tuft (and the stench) told me it was a skunk. I held my breath as I passed and warned several cars and bikes not to hit it—remembering what I had heard, that once you hit a skunk with your car, you can never get the smell out. 

The next day, on the same walk, the skunk was no longer in the center of the road, but on the roadside amidst browned eucalyptus leaves and road detritus. And hovering over it was a large black buzzard—aka a turkey vulture, of the order Cathartidae, from Greek cathartes, which means “purifier”—tugging at what I took to be a long trail of crimson innards. “Ugh” was my first reaction: ugly carrion eater going about its grisly work, adding to the disgusting smell with a disgusting sight. And as I continued walking, I began to reflect on my reaction. And the question arose, “Why do we view carrion eaters as the lowest of the low?” As not noble like the great predators (including us), or even raptors like hawks to whom they’re related, but as nature’s bottom feeders: eaters of putrescent flesh. But then I also remembered reading that humans, when they first began to prowl the open savannahs, were also scavengers, of necessity—not equipped by nature with the teeth and claws of lions or leopards, or even dogs or hyenas, to bring down their own prey. So who are we to condemn scavengers, when that’s probably how we humans began our flesh-eating journey? 

            Then I began to recall that carrion eaters are actually a key part of the eco-system, clearing away the disease that resides in rotting flesh. So these ugly, ungainly birds (there were two more perched on a wire, eagerly awaiting—I imagined them salivating—their turn to dig into that skunky, putrescent flesh) did have a critical function. And that led to reflections on why we are so eager to bury our dead—clearly, at least in part, to keep our precious flesh from becoming a meal for one of these vile creatures whose tiny, raw-looking, red heads seemed to symbolize their lowly, repugnant status. And that in turn led to reflections about why, in fact, we are so anxious to embalm and then entomb our dead; which must come from the notion that the material body is really all we are, and keeping it inviolate is key to something—our hoped-for survival as everlasting beings, perhaps. 

            Then I discovered some fascinating facts about vultures. When vultures feed in a group, as they did on my skunk, they are called a “wake.” Again, this name evokes the idea of death, or perhaps more precisely, a death watch. There are also biological reasons for some of their most revolting  traits: that un-feathered bald head, for example, helps keep their heads clean while feeding, and also helps prevent overheating. Peeing on themselves is yet another somewhat-disgusting (to us) means they use to keep themselves cool. And while Old World vultures locate their prey using their keen avian vision, many of our New World species do not, but rather employ a keen sense of smell, unusual for raptors, to locate carrion. They can smell a good meal from heights of a mile and more—which explains why we see them most often gliding and circling effortlessly on air currents, always signifying to us that a dead carcass must be nearby. 

            Their close relationship to humans goes deeper than that, however. First, they seem to know about us and our wars, and what a great opportunity are our battlefields, where large numbers of eager vultures have regularly been seen feeding on the numerous dead (again, ugh). We also have learned, via scientific investigation, how valuable vultures are to humans, particularly in hotter regions. For we now know that the stomach acid of vultures is exceptionally corrosive—which is what allows them to detoxify and digest carcasses infected with such poisons as botulinum, cholera bacteria, and even the bacteria that causes anthrax. In this way, they help remove these lethal (to us) bacteria from our environment. 

            This helpful function must be what has led to the adoption and near-worship of vultures in ancient cultures. The ancient Egyptians, for example, believed that all vultures were female, and were spontaneously born from eggs, with no need for male fertilization. It was for this reason that they linked vultures to purity. Perhaps more important, the vulture’s ability to “transform” the dead matter on which they feed into life, made them symbols of the recurrent cycle of death and rebirth so important to Egyptians. It is probably for this reason, too, that many of the great royal wives in Egypt actually wore vulture crowns, said to signify the protection of the goddess Nekhbet, a tutelary (patron) deity of Upper Egypt depicted as a vulture. Nekhbet thereby became the symbol of the rulers in ancient Egypt, progressing from that to become the protector of mothers and children throughout the land, worshipped as a goddess. Nekhbet’s headdress always boasted the image of the vulture. 

            In India and Nepal, too, vultures have always been highly valued, but the species has declined dramatically in recent years. The cause has been found to be the presence of the veterinary drug Diclofenac in animal carcasses. The government of India has finally recognized this toxic effect on vultures and banned the drug for use in animals, but it could take many years for vultures to return to their earlier population levels. And without vultures to pick corpses clean, rabid dogs have multiplied, feeding on the carcasses instead of the vultures, and multiplying the prevalence of rabies—thus demonstrating once more the crucial role vultures play in keeping the environment clean and the human population healthy.  

            Perhaps most dramatic are the so-called “sky burials” of the Himalayan region, particularly Tibet and the northern-Chinese province of Qinghai. Sky-burial practice is very old (in Tibetan it is called bya gator, meaning “bird-scattered”), and was also practiced among the Parsees of India. In sky burial, a human corpse is placed on a mountaintop to be disposed of—either by natural decomposition, or through consumption by animals, especially carrion-eating birds like vultures. It is part of a practice called excarnation—that is, removing the flesh and organs of the dead before burial. Its function is to dispose of human remains in as generous and practical a way as possible—practical because in much of the Tibetan plateau, the hard and rocky ground makes it nearly impossible to dig a grave, and with so little timber for fuel, difficult to use the traditional Buddhist method of cremation to dispose of the dead. 

            Buddhism is also key in my final reference to vultures, Vulture Peak, also known as Holy Eagle Peak (apparently because of its shape). Gadhrakuta (Sanskrit for Vulture Peak) is said to have been one of the Buddha’s favorite retreat and training sites. It is located in Rajagaha, in Bihar, India. It is often mentioned in Buddhist texts as the place where the Buddha gave sermons—such as the key one in the Heart Sutra, and the equally-critical sermon in the Lotus Sutra (specifically chapter 16). Again, the link to vultures and purity is reinforced in this latter sutra, with mention of the pure land. 

            In sum, though we moderns tend to link vultures to revulsion, filth and disease, many cultures before us linked them to just the opposite—to purity, to the indispensable function of maintaining the health of human society by keeping it free of deadly pollution from rotting flesh. Perhaps, more generally, that should lead us to become more aware of our modern fetish for cleanliness, our quick response to that in nature which seems disgusting to us, but which functions, rather, to help preserve our health and our lives.

 

Lawrence DiStasi 

 

Thursday, November 18, 2021

Donald Trump, Traitor

 

Not to put too fine a point on it, Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States, is a traitor. As president, he swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States by faithfully executing its laws. These are his publicly-recorded words:

 

I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

 

And yet, in at least two major ways, he has violated that oath. First, he has perpetrated the Big Lie that he actually won the Presidency in the 2020 election, and that he was deprived of his victory by fraud. In pursuit of that claim—rejected by every court and every state that heard it, including Arizona—he and his cohort organized and instigated the January 6 assault on the nation’s Capitol. This resulted in five deaths, with 140 more wounded, and endangered the lives of hundreds of Senators and Representatives, all in the brazen, violent attempt to prevent the assembled Congress from doing its Constitutional duty—e.g. to certify the election. Perilously for our democracy, this attempt to overturn the 2020 election has never quite abated, nor has Trump’s insistence that he is the legitimate president who should be re-instated in place of the “fraudulently-elected” Joseph Biden. 

Second, the migrant conflict on the border of Poland, created by the dictatorial president of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, is a blatant attempt to cause a crisis in NATO by weaponizing migrants. Both Russian President Putin and Pres. Lukashenko know full well that migrants incite right-wing opposition: Viktor Orban took power in Hungary by inflaming popular fears of migrants, and Donald Trump followed the same playbook to take the U.S. presidency in 2016.  Nor is this mere speculation: Lukashenko has publicly promised to “flood the EU with migrants and drugs”— this in response to international sanctions following his downing of a plane that was crossing Belarusian territory carrying dissident journalist Roman Protasevich (see Heather Cox Richardson, “Letter from an American,” Nov. 10, 2021). This, of course, follows the many signs of fealty that Trump gave to Putin, both before and after his election—not least by criticizing and denigrating NATO members and leaders nearly every time he had the opportunity. He is the first US president in memory to have done this, and many critics consider this cozying up to our avowed adversary, while denigrating our perennial allies, as tantamount to treason. Lukashenko’s current move with migrants plays this same game. 

            It is hard to think of more that any president could do to qualify him for treason. In spite of this, Trump retains millions of die-hard supporters throughout this nation. Not only are they supporters, but many of them seem ready and eager to foment a revolt to overthrow the legitimate and now-certified election of Joe Biden, and install their great leader in his place. It is, for me at least, impossible to imagine that most of them are fully aware of what his means. Perhaps they consider the similar attempt to fight a war with the Lincoln-led Union in 1861 as a good precedent for their plans. But that secession-driven attempt, which caused the death of more Americans than all our other wars combined (until the War in Vietnam), was clearly treason. This little detail seems not to matter to Trump’s supporters. Some of the latest evidence for this comes from the now-notorious memos from John Eastman, conservative lawyer (one of Trump’s senior advisers to promote and validate the Big Lie), outlining how VP Pence, acting to supposedly count the votes, could recognize that several states have alternate slates of electors, and thence turn the electoral decision either over to the Congress, where Republican senators could use the filibuster rule to prevail, or to the state legislatures, where Republicans control a majority of state delegations. Either way, Pence, if he went along with the plan (which praise be, he did NOT), could, “without asking for permission,” declare Trump the winner. Subsequently, Subsequently, Eastman also “co-wrote a blueprint for how Trump could use the military, the police, and criminal gangs to hold onto power after a disputed election” (Lindsay Beverstein, “The Evidence We now Have is Utterly Damning,” Raw Story, Nov. 18.) The Jan. 6 insurrection followed. 

Even more astonishing than the collusion of Trumpistas, is the collusion of almost the entire Republican Party. Every member of that party in the current Congress, with a few glaring exceptions like Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, as well as thirteen outliers who took the risky step of voting recently for the Infrastructure package sponsored by the hated Democrats (earning them vilification and death threats), has genuflected at the altar of Trump to follow his lead. This includes that arch-hypocrite, Senate majority leader McConnell, and House minority leader, Kevin McCarthy. How is this possible? What of the party of Lincoln? What of the alleged conservative commitment to Constitutional originalism? It’s as if we’re in the topsy-turvy world of Alice in Wonderland, and makes one wonder:  Have any of these people ever read the Constitution, or the Declaration of Independence? 

            Let’s quickly review those two revered documents. The Declaration has these words in its second paragraph:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal… 

 

This does not say “some men” or “only men of noble birth or white skin color.” It says all. Jefferson goes on to enumerate all the violations committed by the British King as reasons why “these sovereign states” are cutting their bond with him—essentially because of his behavior as a  dictator who considers himself superior to common settlers, e.g. the people of America. In other words, the polar opposite of a leader in a democracy.   

As to Amendment XII of the Constitution, reflecting Article II, Section 1, Paragraph 3, it says:

The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed… 

 

That is about as clear as it gets, and means exactly what it says: the president of the Senate, that is, the then-sitting Vice-President, Mike Pence, must open the votes from the Electors of each state, and count them. The entire Congress—not the president, he is not a King—then certifies the election. This is its Constitutional duty, as it was Mike Pence’s duty, which he faithfully carried out on Jan. 6. 

But, the Constitution notwithstanding, Trump has continued to express his rage at Pence, the same rage that his minions expressed by screaming “Hang Mike Pence” as they invaded the Capitol on January 6. Though he was protected by the Secret Service, and escaped lynching that day, it was clear that the Vice-President of the United States was shaken. Trump, meanwhile, has continued to complain (as if he were King) about this alleged betrayal by his Vice-President and supposed ally in not following John Eastman’s script. The latest twist in this nearly-unbelievable episode of a president turning on his own vice president, is his expression of approval of the insurrectionist behavior in an interview conducted in March by Jonathan Karl of ABC news. In Karl’s rendering of that interview, to appear in his forthcoming book, Betrayal: The Final Act of the Trump Show, he quotes the former president as follows:

“It’s common sense, Jon. It’s common sense that you’re supposed to protect…How can you, if you know a vote is fraudulent, right, how can you pass on a fraudulent vote to Congress?”

 

What this means is that Donald Trump defended the invaders’ chants of “Hang Mike Pence” during the Jan. 6  attack, saying it was “understandable” because they were angry that the legitimately-conducted election hadn’t been overturned(quoted by Jesse Rodriguez and Rebecca Shabad, “Trump Defends Jan. 6 rioters’ ‘hang Mike Pence” chant in new audio,” nbcnews.com, Nov. 12, 2021.) One comment about this, among many, is that of CNN legal analyst Elie Honig, who said on Nov. 12:

"Big picture: first of all, this is a constitutional nightmare. This is a constitutional worst-case scenario. The utter madness of a president… who is endorsing, supporting these people who are attacking his vice president.” 

 

As if the unhinged behavior and comments of the former President were not enough, one of his former principal advisers, Steve Bannon, has added to the fire. Bannon, like many of Trump’s inner circle, refused to honor a subpoena from the House Committee Investigating the Jan. 6 Assault on the Capitol (the committee had asked Bannon for documents and testimony). Charged with criminal contempt for defying the subpoena, he was taken into custody by the FBI, defiantly alleging that his people would take action. But even before being charged, Bannon had clearly stated, on his War Room podcast (the war room is what the Willard Hotel meeting on the eve of Jan. 6 among Trump conspirators, including Giuliani, Bannon, and Eastman, is also called), what he and the right-wing Trump minions were trying to do: do away with democracy to reverse the results of the Trump loss in 2020:

“‘We’re taking action. We’re taking over school boards. We’re taking over the Republican Party with the precinct committee strategy. We’re taking over all the elections,’ Bannon said.” (Peter Wade, Rolling Stone, Nov. 12, 2021)

 

Not content with that, Bannon added to this defiance when he was taken into custody by the FBI: 

 

"I'm telling you right now, this is going to be the misdemeanor from hell for Merrick Garland, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden," Bannon told reporters after the hearing, swearing his team is "going to go on the offense." (cnn.com, Nov. 15, 2021)

 

How much more offensive the Trumpers can get is not immediately clear. But it is clear that Donald Trump and his minions have little regard for either the law, or democracy itself. 

            One more element has recently surfaced. Tom Boggioni writes that Max Boot, the conservative military expert, referenced a memo to Donald Trump “making the case to fire Defense Secretary Mike Esper” as evidence that Trump wanted to find some other head of the military whom he could control. The said memo, written by Trump’s director of personnel, Johnny McEntee (formerly his baggage handler) was “both sinister and ludicrous.” It made the case for getting rid of a Cabinet officer because of “insufficient loyalty to the president.” Boot goes on to say that Trump “appears determined to turn the military into his personal goon squad.” Further, if he manages to get another term as president,  “Trump would want to ensure that the ‘guys with guns’ are on his side” (Raw Story, Nov. 15, 2021). In short, Donald Trump has had no compunctions in the past, and certainly would not in the future, about using the U.S. military (before him, mostly kept from use as a political actor) to compel domestic compliance with his dictates—very much like the kings and dictators he admires most. 

            Enough said. The former president seems to take pride in breaking with America’s most hallowed traditions, up to and including behavior that seems, and, in my opinion is, treasonous. That he has been able to get away with this, so far, is an indication of how far the United States has strayed from the democratic republic that was once the envy of the world. And also, how huge portions of the public seem totally unaware of the danger that inheres in that departure, and/or how little they seem to care. Let us hope that the danger is forestalled before it is too late—before, that is, a real dictator steps on stage. 

 

Lawrence DiStasi