When commenting on the change in
practices from farmers of a half-century ago to the contract growers of today,
Sonia Faruqi in her book Project Animal
Farm (Pegasus Books: 2015), concludes this way:
“Animal
use has become synonymous with animal abuse.”
That is really the thesis of her
book in a nutshell, and something that all of us need to be reminded of again
and again. Our industrial agriculture, specifically the ‘production’ of animals
we use for meat and to produce our eggs and milk, has become a mass torture
chamber in which animals are abused in the name of efficiency, biosecurity,
feeding a hungry world, and the essential consideration of profit. To be sure,
we have heard this often before. There have been countless books and documentaries
and exposès of the horrors that go on at factory farms. So why this book?
Because Faruqi, a one-time Wall Streeter who lost her job in the recession of
2008, has done what few have done before: she has actually visited animal
farms, has stayed with and befriended the owners and contract growers, and has
endured outfitting herself in the bio-hazard suits that are now necessary for
anyone to slow walk through chicken facilities, egg-laying facilities, pig
facilities, dairy facilities and slaughter houses. They are that toxic.
Further, Faruqi has visited animal farms not only in the United States and
Canada, but also in Malaysia, Indonesia, Mexico, and Dubai to inform us that
even as Europeans and some Americans are revolting against the most disgusting
practices recently revealed, large European- and American-based agribusinesses are
rapidly expanding their brutal operations abroad, especially to Asia and Latin
America. And everything is being
exported: not just the machinery and methods and breeds to manufacture meat for
McDonald’s, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and Walmart, but also the industrial
world’s appetite for meat. Here is how she puts it:
Fast
food succeeds only on the basis of factory farms….Fast food chains alter not
just meat production but also meat consumption. People start eating more meat,
and this greater amount of meat is produced more deplorably. The low prices at
fast food cash registers are a direct result of callous indifference toward
farm animals. (247).
Thus, in a small country like
Malaysia, Faruqi reports, there are now more than 500 KFCs, 300 Pizza Huts, and
300 McDonald’s. Furthermore, a global survey in 2004 found that Malaysians eat
even more fast food than Americans do: where only 1 of every 3 Americans eats
fast food once a week, 3 of every 5 Malaysians do.
To
produce all that Kentucky Fried Chicken at low prices, KFC has become the
biggest “integrator” in Malaysia, setting up the machinery for chicken
warehouses with always more rows of cages to keep chickens imprisoned,
delivering their own fast-growing DOCs (day-old chicks) to the factory farmers,
and ‘harvesting’ them within 6 weeks to be slaughtered in their own processing
plants for delivery to their outlets. These are modern, genetically developed
‘super chickens.’ As Faruqi explains, computer-aided genetic selection has
created breeds, like Tyson’s Cobb chicken or Aviagen’s Ross 308, that
accelerate growth and the amount of breast meat to astounding levels:
In
1925, chickens reached a weight of 2-1/2 pounds in 16 weeks; today, they reach
a weight of almost 6 pounds in 6 weeks (while consuming less than half the feed
per pound of weight gained). It’s miraculous but torturous (100).
The torture arises because this
creates chickens (and turkeys, which have the same problem: too much breast
meat growing too fast: the weight of modern turkeys multiplies 300 times
between birth and slaughter—now a period of only 16 weeks!) that are literally
frankenfoods. Their breasts grow so big their legs can’t support them, so most
spend their lives sprawled on floors covered with excrement. Worse, their
internal organs can’t keep up with their explosive growth, and so they collapse
of heart and lung ailments. In order to control these problems, desperate
measures are required. Here’s how one of Faruqi’s informants, Terry at a
factory farm in Canada, puts it:
“The
lights have to be very controlled, so the chickens gain weight but don’t get
heart attacks. When the lights are on, the chickens are awake and eating and
gaining weight. When it’s dark, they stop eating. We don’t want them to eat too
much, because their genes are weird. They grow too fast, and their heart and
legs get fucked up. They get heart attacks. So, we need to control how much
they eat, and we control it with the lighting levels.” ((95).
A similar problem afflicts
egg-laying chickens, nearly all now kept in cages (4 to 6 chickens are crammed
into a metal cage no larger than a microwave). Even at an “organic” farm in
Canada, these caged egg-laying hens must be de-beaked, a cruel practice that
has been banned in Europe. And why must hens be de-beaked? First, because of
the torturous cage-crowding they are raised in. But also because the genetic
selection used to get hens that lay more eggs works inversely with “broodiness,”
i.e. the instinct to mother their chicks. It also works directly with
aggressiveness. So, the more eggs they can lay, the more aggressive the hens
become, and they literally become cannibals: pecking each other to death and
eating the remains. Thus, de-beaking is justified by the industry as a ‘cure’
for cannibalism; as is low lighting and walling the cages so hens can’t see and
imitate each other. The place where egg-laying hens (and soon all
meat-producing hens as well) live has thus become a dark, filthy, toxic and
dangerous dungeon that most chicken growers themselves hardly enter, preferring
to control lighting, feeding and all else via computers. And all this to do
that which is the only metric used in corporate farming: increasing the unit of
production.
To
her credit, Sonia Faruqi doesn’t leave things there. She also visits more or
less ideal animal farms and demonstrates that the animals we use for food need
not be raised in medieval torture chambers. Harley Farms in Canada, for
example, is reminiscent of the farms of old, though it is quite a bit larger.
Run by an Englishman who had to leave his English farm during the mad cow
scare, Harley Farms is a kind of animal heaven: its 400-500 beef cattle live
outside almost the entire year, while its 100 sows and pigs are housed in
specially-built wooden sheds. The baby piglets are kept in a barn bedded with
hay and straw rather than excrement, and rather than looking zombified, the
animals are lively and playful. Faruqi describes it:
I breathed deeply; the barn
smelled…good. Pastoral farms smell
good, I realized then, because soil and straw absorb manure and odor. The piglets
are happy….Unhappy pigs, such as Charlie’s, bite each other’s tails until they
bleed. Happy pigs, such as Roger’s, are calm and contented, mischievous and
adventurous (127).
Of course, such farms are seen as a
threat by the big industrial producers, who, in fact, tried to buy Roger Harley
out, offering him a quarter of a million dollars yearly to stop him from
“expressing my views” about humane farming. Fortunately, he turned them down,
but most other small farmers eventually succumb. In Vermont, the emblematic
small dairy farms where cows actually live to see and eat grass, are almost
gone—bought out by huge operations with which they cannot compete. And around
the world, the dominant trend is more epitomized by one of the KFC chicken
farms in Malaysia run by a Mr. Hubib, whose operation produces some 160,000 broiler
chickens every month in four giant
warehouses. Not content with this, Mr. Hubib proudly explained to Faruqi that
he was eagerly awaiting a new system involving cages for his broiler chickens
(heretofore, cages have been used mainly for egg-laying chickens because of the
fear that broilers would bruise their flesh on the wire floors of cages and
reduce their value; but now, plastic flooring has solved that problem). Hubib’s
numbers revealed all: where in the closed chicken houses he had currently, he
could allot 0.75 square feet per chicken (in an open house, the allotment would
be 1.2 sq ft.), in the new broiler cages he’ll soon have, “I give chicken only
.44 square foot, and I have a lot of chicken. I have 54,000 in one barn! I make
a lot of money” (233).
There
is much more to this eye-opening book, but you get the idea. What we have is an
animal-producing system of corporate agriculture that gives the world the
increased quantity of meat it has been taught to want, at the cheap prices it can
afford, all going on “behind a giant subterfuge… so removed from the day-to-day
lives of most people that they might as well be occurring in a separate
universe” (196). And it is a huge universe. Tyson, the largest meat producer in
the world, “slaughters more than 2 billion chickens a year, along with 20
million pigs and 7 million cattle” (230), while, worldwide, upwards of 70
billion farm animals are raised for food each year. Increasingly, the dreadful
conditions in which they are raised is a world of animal abuse, cannibalism
(“Chickens excrete the cow parts that they eat, and these parts are fed back to
cows in the form of chicken feces; this strange cannibalism chain creates an
alarming danger of disease, including mad cow disease” 264), and diseases like
cow ringworm, whose cure is simple sunlight. But in the brave new world of
industrial animal production, sunlight, like grass, is the rarest of commodities.
Here is how Faruqi puts it near her conclusion:
Most
farm animals today live and die without ever feeling a ray of sunshine on their
backs or a blade of grass under their feet. Every hour builds upon the next in
a perpetual hell, and the misery continues onward without reprieve. Existing in
conditions of disease and decay, animals die before their deaths (328).
Among the many problems we face in
our world, this one ranks high. For if we persist in treating animals as if
they were unfeeling “things” completely unrelated to us, then it cannot be long
before we also treat humans in similar ways. Indeed, we already do. For it
cannot be a coincidence that the system that is now polluting the world of
modern agriculture (and ourselves) was conceived in the same nation, the United
States of America, that leads the world in locking up human beings, caging them
in solitary confinement, depriving them of human contact, and sunlight, and all
the natural sights and sounds and interactions that alone keep sentient beings
human.
Can
it be long before our corporate overlords decide that these same constrained
environments are economically and socially adequate for all of us—or at least the
vast majority of us who cannot afford to buy our own private islands?
Lawrence DiStasi
No comments:
Post a Comment