I’m in a kind of climate depression. Yes, it’s an
actual term, as you can see if you read a little blog (http://the-mound-of-sound.blogspot.com/2014/10/climate-change-fatigue-or-eco-depression.html) I found describing what happened recently to a
Professor Camille Parmesan: she became so “professionally depressed” that, even
with a Nobel Peace Prize (shared with Al Gore in 2007 as lead author of the
Third Assessment Report of the IPCC), she started questioning her whole life’s
work, moved out of the U.S. to the U.K, and doubted that she’d ever return to
studying the dying coral reefs that are her specialty. Nor is she alone, she said:
“I don’t know of a single scientist that’s not having an emotional reaction to
what is being lost.”
My
depression, though, is not from doing science or even my recent reading of Naomi
Klein’s book This Changes Everything
(see blog for Nov. 30, 2014). Because the truth is, Klein soft-pedaled the real
situation by focusing on what we, the people of the Earth, especially those in
developed nations, could do to keep the warming of the earth from exceeding 2
degrees Celsius. Her implication clearly was that we still had time (though
only till 2017); and that if we could just rid ourselves of capitalism and move
from an ideology of extractivism to one of stewardship, we could prevent global
catastrophe. And of course, we all want to believe that, human brains being
wired to believe there is hope no matter how massive the problem, the worst is
always in the distant future, yes, we can somehow figure out a fix. An
interview that the journalist Dahr Jamail did with climate scientist Guy
McPherson, though, dashed that view completely. The title of the piece,
appearing on Truthout.org, gives the idea quickly: “Are Humans Going Extinct?”
And what the piece concludes is that, yes, the extinction of our species is
already well under way due to climate change, and is probably inevitable.
Guy
McPherson deserves some attention in this regard; he’s a professor emeritus of
ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Arizona who has been
studying anthropogenic climate disruption (ACD) for three decades. A lot of
what he has been finding and preaching can be found on his website with the apt
title: Nature Bats Last (http://guymcpherson.com/). I highly
recommend it, though it is not for the faint of heart. Because what he says is
sobering indeed—so sobering, in fact, that McPherson, suffering a kind of
climate depression himself, has changed his message from the dreadful warnings
about what he sees coming, to counseling people to just do what they love
because it’s not going to matter much as far as the climate is concerned. Naomi
Klein cited a paper Brad Werner gave at the meeting of the American Geophysical
Union in 2012—“Is Earth F**ked?”—and its title is relevant here; because for McPherson
and many of the scientists he cites, the answer is a clear “Yes.” Earth Is Fucked. Or rather, not earth itself—for earth will survive as it
has many times in the past; but for the human species and most other life on the
planet, Earth is, indeed, fucked. Is, if the numbers are correct, heading for a
mass extinction event comparable to the Permian Extinction about 250 million
years ago that wiped out 95% of marine and 70% of terrestrial species then
living.
With
regard to the 2 degree limit that Klein stakes her whole book on, McPherson and
many other scientists insist we’re
already there. That is to say, as Dr. Peter Wadhams, one of the most
cautious commenters on the climate and head of the Polar Ocean Physics Group at
Cambridge, asserts in his August 8, 2014 youtube video: ‘the 2 degree limit was
already reached in the 1960s.’ That is, even if we had stopped carbon emissions
in 1960, the 2 degree warming would be reached anyway as a result of all the
carbon emitted until then. I think this is something not widely understood and
it should be: carbon emissions take something like 40 years to produce their
effects. So trying for a 2 degree limit now is a fool’s errand; as is creating the
impression that we still have time to reach a 2 degree limit, which is really a
kind of subterfuge engaged in by governments and UN conferences and the IPCC.
And in fact, McPherson quotes Wadhams thusly: “the carbon dioxide that we put
into the atmosphere, which now exceeds 400 parts per million, is sufficient, if
you don’t add any more, to actually raise global temperatures in the end by
about 4 degrees.” Again, it’s that 40-year gap between emissions and warming. If
emissions up to 1960 are enough to reach 2 degrees, and the emissions we’ve
been pouring into the atmosphere since then are greater by many degrees of
magnitude, then it’s clear that unless some miracle happens, we’re well on the
way to 4 degrees or more by as soon as midcentury (this does not even include
the damage done by methane [an even more deadly warming gas] seeps which, on
their own, according to one researcher, will raise global-average temperatures
by more than 4 degrees Celsius by 2030). And 4 degrees, or 5 or 6 or more, as
many scientists project, essentially makes the planet uninhabitable by humans—a
“dead planet” according to McPherson, on which no one, not even the very
wealthy who think to insulate themselves in safe havens surrounded by their own
police, will be safe. (By the way, the base line against which temperature
increases such as 2 degrees Celsius are measured is the temperature in 1750,
about when the Industrial Revolution began).
In
short, we as a species are fucked.
Now
every fiber in my being rebels when I write this. Even “knowing” what I know
(and it should be clear to everyone that most of us really don’t have any firsthand
way to verify the effects scientists keep warning us about; we have to weigh
the evidence, yield to majority scientific opinion, take into account recent
unusual climate events like Hurricane Sandy and the melting Arctic Ice, and act
accordingly—which is why idiots like Senator James Inhofe and the hucksters at
the Heartland Institute can keep blowing smoke to confuse the issue and
maintain that the whole global warming scare is a hoax cooked up by Hollywood
liberals like Barbara Streisand—Inhofe actually said that!—to advance the
liberal/socialist agenda), even knowing what I know I want to leave humanity an
exit, an escape hatch. Surely there is some technological fix that will save us
(Klein debunks this in her chapter called “No Messiahs.”) We are, after all,
the quintessence of dust, the paragon of animals, as Hamlet put it. The chosen
species, the lords of creation. Which is, in fact, part of the problem. We
really do think we are special. We
really do see ourselves as separate from all other species—which we lump
together as “Nature.” And granted by God “dominion” over them all, inalienable
rights over all creation. I was raised to believe this, we were all raised and
indoctrinated into believing this. So it’s almost impossible to believe otherwise;
to believe that this time, there really is no technological fix (even Peter
Wadhams suggests some temporary geo-engineering miracle that can give us time),
no god or leader or scientist or group action that can save us. But if Guy
McPherson and most scientists are right, that is precisely the ‘fix’ we are in;
the hole we have dug ourselves. Our arrogance, our ignorance of the
interrelatedness of all species, of our dependence on all others including
lowly bacteria and dirt for our sustenance, has led us to think—since Francis
Bacon expressed it 400 years ago—that we can and should treat the globe as our own
little ball, to be used up and exploited in any way we can imagine to make our
journey more comfortable. Blow off the tops of mountains to get at coal. Spread
poisons on the soil to make farming easier, to make growth and life itself
possible only for those plants that we can consume; those insects and birds and
fish and mammals that we consider useful to us. The rest be damned, dammed, including
the life-giving waters from which we sprang. Now we are seeing, as McPherson’s
website warns us like a siren screaming in the night that Nature really does
Bat Last. That we pay a price for imagining ourselves as separate from all
else. And that the price may be the ultimate price any species can pay:
extinction.
This
makes me cry in the night. This has given me an intense pain in my soul. It has even forced
me to reconsider writing this, or thinking about this anymore at all. It is too
depressing; too cataclysmic; too destructive of everything and everyone I value.
But in the end, I have to conclude that we cannot keep burying our heads in the
sand. In the end, we are obligated—even “knowing” that it is futile—to keep
trying to know, to ameliorate the situation to whatever extent we can. We have
to keep trying to delay the worst effects, by working to browbeat or persuade
or legislate or shame others into seeing the truth: the entire human project is
in grave peril. Anything we can do to help save something, to delay the worst
effects, as Wadhams says, until some solution, some miracle might be found, is
worth doing, even if the odds of its working are miniscule. It is still worth
doing. For it is no more than what we do daily anyway, in the face of our certain
knowledge that we will die.
Guy McPherson
himself has come to this conclusion. After being viciously attacked for years,
and seeing the sad effects his message has on people’s hopes, he has modified
it: Keep doing what you love to do, he now counsels. Keep loving. Even if the
worst happens, at least you will have done your best to create something of
value in the world.
I
don’t know what else to say. I apologize if this is too disturbing. I apologize
if it leaves you depressed or hopeless. All I can offer is the truth as it’s
gathered at the website (which in turn has gathered it from the most reliable
sources available) noted above. And the idea, too, that we really do not know
the future, cannot predict it no matter how gifted our instruments, how clever
our algorithms. We simply cannot ever know for sure what emergent evolution
will come up with, what the universe itself will come up with. All we can do is
trust that existence involves more than what our little brains can comprehend,
and that in that enormous potential inherent in every inch of space lies the something
that somehow, for untold billions of years, has been able to go on. And will
continue.
Lawrence DiStasi
No comments:
Post a Comment