There is not much profit in expatiating once again on the
perils of an armed-to-the-teeth populace in the United States—thanks to the
National Rifle Association (NRA). We all know the false mantra that has become
so sickening in our time: guns don’t kill, people do. If you want to read
chapter and verse about this organized insanity, check out Saturday’s piece by
Matthew Chapman, “What Will it Take for Americans to Reject the NRA?” I also
just saw an interesting statistic from a similar piece today: there are 58
murders a year by firearms in Britain, and 8,775 in the United States.
For
me, though, the Aurora Colorado massacre evokes other sadnesses and ironies. To
begin with, isn’t it fitting that a 24-year-old all-honors grad student should
enter a theatre premiering the latest violence fantasy, style himself as The
Joker, and open fire on the crowd? Batman in the films based on the comic is
always battling evil geniuses—the Joker being the most memorable—who commit
virtually motiveless violence. They’re just evil. James Holmes seems to be, or
want to be, one of these. No one had done him any harm. He doesn’t seem to have
been psychologically maimed in any obvious way—indeed, his latest project was
investigating the "Biological Basis of Psychiatric and Neurological
Disorders." And yet, he carefully plans his murderous spree, entering the
theater normally, exiting from a side exit whose door he carefully leaves ajar,
arms himself with assault weapons, tear gas, body armor and a gas mask, and
re-enters to begin his slaughter of people he knows nothing about. He
apparently just wanted to kill people.
Questions
immediately come to mind. Did he realize what he was doing? Did he have any
idea what it’s like to be shot, to bleed, to suffer, to be devastated by the
loss of a child, a lover, a relative? Did his mirror neuron system—that system
which allegedly gives us our most precious human quality, that of empathy—work
at all, or was he one of those, classified as psychopaths, whose mirror neuron
system seems to be defective or inactive? And then we have to think: this guy
was only 24, and had probably grown up as a devotee of precisely the comic and
film fantasies glorifying violence, growing always more graphic in their depictions
of slaughter, that are replicated in video games and TV shows daily, hourly,
constantly as our most common form of entertainment. Watching killing,
simulating killing, identifying with killers, in short, is our main form of
fun. So why should we be surprised when young men like Holmes, or the high
school students who shot up Columbine High School, or the student named
Seung-Hui Cho who shot up his Virginia Tech classrooms, or any other mass
murderer splashes into our lives to chill our souls. Shouldn’t we, rather,
expect it to happen regularly—especially given the fact that the weapons of mass
destruction these guys use are as easy to procure as chewing gum?
And
this doesn’t even take into account our history. America began with violence,
with a violent takeover of occupied land, and has continued with similar
violence ever since. Settlers were all armed so they could slaughter Indians
who showed any reluctance to hand over their lands. Southern planters were
armed so they could demonstrate to the slaves upon whom their wealth depended
that even a hint of attempting to escape or rebel would be met with lethal
force. Animals—first the buffalo, then the predators that might threaten
livestock, like wolves, bears, and cougars—were slaughtered with increasing
fury, the heirs of this slaughter being the hunters on whose behalf the NRA
still justifies the “right to bear arms.” Any excuse to start a nice little war
was taken as yet another opportunity to expand our always-expanding territory:
Mexico, the War of 1812, the Civil War, the Spanish American War, Hawaii, and
on and on. Today, the weapons industry is perhaps the most vital, the only vital industry at which America still leads the
world. And even where the product is not weapons, American capitalism is by its
very nature a violent sport—its object the destruction of any competitor or
regulation or worker organization that stands in the way of always increasing
growth, always spiraling profit? So why should we be surprised when a young man
absorbs all this, and decides to kill himself a few folks, just for the hell of
it?
And
yet we all are. Just looking at his face—the face of our latest mass murderer—alarms
us because it seems to lack that in us which we imagine gives us our humanity.
That inclines us to recognize in other humans, at least, kindred spirits
deserving of our sympathy and empathy; beings whom we go out of our way to help,
if we can, rather than blast to nothingness. And yet, Holmes’ face exhibits
none of this. He looks to us more like a zombie. An automaton acting as if on
automatic pilot to destroy human beings at random. Without passion. Without animosity.
Without any emotion whatever, apparently, except perhaps the joy of a boy
engaging in the wanton destruction of insects. And in this, he reminds us of some
of the other destroyers in our culture. Encased in body armor and wearing a gas
mask—all to make himself invulnerable—he reminds us of American troops
advancing on Iraqis and Afghanis in their
body armor; of armored Tac squads advancing on demonstrators in our own streets;
the objects of their “cleansing” simply trash to them. And then there are our
weapons du jour, our infamous
drones. Poor Holmes apparently couldn’t get his hands on any of these, but they
are, in many ways, just like him. Invulnerable to attack, because they are destructive
weapons without a human face, drones are the perfect expression of the cowardly
violence of our time. They are precisely targeted from thousands of miles away
by computer techies at keyboards guiding them without fear or risk of
retaliation. And they strike with deadly force and allegedly deadly accuracy
anywhere in the world where “terrorists” are presumed to be gathered, giving no
warning whatever. Perfect. Weapons that eliminate anyone or anything that
appears to threaten us, all with no risk to American personnel, no blood on the
hands of those who can go home to dinner after their remote-control killing is
done, and play with the kids.
Is
Holmes a drone? a zombie? Perhaps not. Perhaps he has his story to tell. But
wittingly or not, he has become the latest expression of our increasingly soul-less
nation in our increasingly soul-less time. Predictably shocked that such a nice
boy, from such a nice family, in such a nice neighborhood, could possibly act
as if he were one of the living dead.
Lawrence DiStasi
No comments:
Post a Comment